Translasi dan Uji Validitas Isi Questionnaire on Satisfaction with Clinical Practice for Students
Sari
ABSTRACT
Student satisfaction is one of the main indicators in evaluating the effectiveness of clinical learning. Assessing nursing students' satisfaction with clinical learning is a crucial aspect in evaluating the quality of nursing education. However, to date, there is still limited availability of standardized, valid, and reliable instruments or questionnaires in Indonesian that specifically measure nursing students' satisfaction with clinical learning, particularly regarding clinical practice. To translate and validate the content of the Questionnaire on Satisfaction with Clinical Practice for Students (QSCP-S) into an Indonesian version to ensure that the questionnaire items retain their original conceptual meaning and are relevant to the Indonesian context. This process included forward translation, backward translation, expert review, and content validity testing. The translation process was carried out by six translators, and the content validity test was conducted by seven nursing experts. Data were analyzed using I-CVI, S-CVI/UA, S-CVI/Ave, and CVR to determine the relevance, clarity, and essentiality of the instrument. The recommended I-CVI and CVR values are >0.78. The scores for the 23 items in the Indonesian version of the QSCP-S questionnaire were: relevance (I-CVI) 0.86-1.00; S-CVI/Ave 0.98; S-CVI/UA 0.91; clarity (S-CVI/Ave 0.87); and essentiality (CVR 1.00). The Indonesian version of the QSCP-S questionnaire demonstrated good validity. The items were revised based on the expert's suggestions and recommendations, with the original questionnaire remaining at 23 items.
Keywords: Clinical Practice, Content Validity Test, Student Satisfaction, Translation.
ABSTRAK
Kepuasan mahasiswa merupakan salah satu indikator utama dalam mengevaluasi efektivitas pembelajaran klinik. Penilaian terhadap kepuasan mahasiswa keperawatan dalam pembelajaran klinik merupakan aspek krusial dalam evaluasi mutu pendidikan keperawatan. Namun, hingga saat ini, masih terdapat keterbatasan dalam ketersediaan instrumen atau kuisioner yang terstandarisasi, valid dan reliabel dalam bahasa Indonesia yang secara spesifik mengukur kepuasan mahasiswa keperawatan terhadap pembelajaran klinik khususnya tentang praktik klinik. Translasi dan validitas isi Questionnaire on Satisfaction with Clinical Practice for Students (QSCP-S) ke dalam versi bahasa Indonesia untuk menjamin butir-butir kuisioner mempertahankan makna konseptual aslinya dan relevan dengan konteks Indonesa. Proses ini mencakup tahapan forward translation, backward translation, expert review, dan uji validitas isi (content validity). Proses translasi dilakukan oleh 6 penerjemah dan uji validitas isi oleh 7 orang expert di bidang keperawatan. Data dianalisis dengan I-CVI, S-CVI/UA, S-CVI/Ave dan CVR untuk mengetahui relevansi, kejelasan dan essensialitas instrumen. Nilai I-CVI dan CVR yang direkomendasikan >0,78. Nilai dari 23 item pernyataan dalam kuisioner QSCP-S versi Bahasa Indonesia adalah relevansi I-CVI 0.86-1.00;S-CVI/Ave 0.98; S-CVI/UA 0.91, kejelasan S-CVI/Ave 0.87, esensialitas CVR 1.00. Kuisioner QSCP-S versi Bahasa Indonesia menunjukkan uji validitas kategori baik, item-item dalam kuisioner direvisi sesuai saran dan rekomendasi penilai (expert) dan dipertahankan berjumlah 23 item sama seperti kuisioner versi aslinya.
Kata Kunci: Kepuasan Mahasiswa, Praktik Klinik, Translasi, Uji Validitas Isi.
Teks Lengkap:
Download ArtikelReferensi
Cant, R. P., & Cooper, S. J. (2017). The value of simulation-based learning in pre-licensure nurse education: A state-of-the-art review and meta-analysis. Nurse Education in Practice, 27, 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2017.08.012
Čukljek, S., Županić, M., & Takšić, I. (2024). Development and validation of satisfaction with clinical practice questionnaire for mentors and students. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 21(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnes-2022-0124
D’Souza, M. S., Karkada, S. N., Parahoo, K., & Venkatesaperumal, R. (2015). Perception of and satisfaction with the clinical learning environment among nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 35(6), 833–840. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.02.005
Dalawi, I., Isa, M. R., Chen, X. W., Azhar, Z. I., & Aimran, N. (2023). Development of the Malay Language of understanding, attitude, practice and health literacy questionnaire on COVID-19 (MUAPHQ C-19): content validity & face validity analysis. BMC Public Health, 23(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16044-5
Dessler, G. (2017). Human Resource Management. Pearson Education Canada. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=DWvYAQAACAAJ
Fernández-García, D., Giménez-Espert, M. D. C., Castellano-Rioja, E., & Prado-Gascó, V. (2020). What Academic Factors Influence Satisfaction With Clinical Practice in Nursing Students? Regressions vs. fsQCA. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(December). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.585826
Fujiwan, A. (2019). Pentingnya Kolaborasi Tim Kesehatan Dirumah Sakit. 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/zkwx2
Gjersing, L., Caplehorn, J. R., & Clausen, T. (2010). Cross-cultural adaptation of research instruments: Language, setting, time and statistical considerations. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-13
Haryanti, F., Nursanti, I., Nuraini, T., & Hidayati, W. (2021). Kurikulum Pendidikan Ners Indonesia Tahun 2021. In Aipni.
Hendryadi, H. (2017). Validitas Isi: Tahap Awal Pengembangan Kuesioner. Jurnal Riset Manajemen Dan Bisnis (JRMB) Fakultas Ekonomi UNIAT, 2(2), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.36226/jrmb.v2i2.47
Jadmiko, A. W., & Felaza, E. (2023). Factors Influencing Nursing Student’s Satisfaction in the Clinical Practice Education Program: A Systematic Review. Indonesian Journal of Medicine, 8(2), 225–235. https://doi.org/10.26911/theijmed.2023.08.02.12
Lenz, A. S., Gómez Soler, I., Dell’Aquilla, J., & Uribe, P. M. (2017). Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Assessments for Use in Counseling Research. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 50(4), 224–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2017.1320947
Papastavrou, E., Dimitriadou, M., Tsangari, H., & Andreou, C. (2016). Nursing students’ satisfaction of the clinical learning environment: A research study. BMC Nursing, 15(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-016-0164-4
Paturohman, A. (2024). Kepuasan Kerja Perawat berhubungan dengan Perilaku Bekerja Secara Ekstra di Ruang Rawat. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Keperawatan, 10 (1)(1), 112–122.
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The Content Validity Index : Are You Sure You Know What ’ s Being Reported ? Critique and Recommendations. 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur
Polit, D. F., Beck, T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Focus on Research Methods Is the CVI an Acceptable Indicator of Content Validity ? Appraisal and Recommendations. 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur
Putriyanti, C. E., Pamenang, G. U., & Suwarsono, S. (2020). Pengaruh Pelatihan Perceptorship Terhadap Tingkat Pengetahuan, Sikap Pembimbing Klinik Dan Kepuasan Mahasiswa Dalam Proses Bimbingan Di Klinik. Jurnal Kesehatan, 8(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.46815/jkanwvol8.v8i1.42
Ramadhan, M. F., Siroj, R. A., & Afgani, M. W. (2024). Validitas and Reliabilitas. Journal on Education, 6(2), 10967–10975. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v6i2.4885
Shqirat, J., Faraj, S., Omar, S., & CheAmran, A. (2024). Nursing Students Satisfaction in Clinical Learning Environment Al-Makassed Training Hospital in Palestine. Tuijin Jishu/Journal of Propulsion Technology, 45(1), 1001–4055.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33024/mahesa.v6i5.22771
Refbacks
- Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.
Publisher: Universitas Malahayati Lampung

Semua artikel dapat digunakan dibawah lisensi Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License


Panduan Penulisan





