Relationship Between Perceived Benefit And Perceived Barrier Of Pregnant Women With K6 Visiting Behavior

Hajiah Muallifah* -  Program Studi Sarjana Terapan Kebidanan, Poltekkes Kemenkes Surabaya, Indonesia
Abdul Latip -  Program Studi Sarjana Terapan Kebidanan, Poltekkes Kemenkes Surabaya, Indonesia
Lilik Triyawati -  Program Studi Sarjana Terapan Kebidanan, Poltekkes Kemenkes Surabaya, Indonesia

Latar Belakang : Data laporan Pemantauan Wilayah Setempat Kesehatan Ibu dan Anak (PWS KIA) Puskesmas Dander tahun 2021, didapatkan masalah capaian K6 di Puskesmas Dander yaitu belum mencapai target, dengan kesenjangan sebanyak 33,9% dengan target K6 tahun 2021 sebesar 100% sementara Puskesmas Dander pada tahun 2021 capaian K6 sebesar 66,1% dari jumlah ibu hamil sebanyak 563. Tujuan : Untuk menganalisis hubungan perceived benefit dan perceived barrier ibu hamil dengan perilaku kunjungan K6. Metodologi : Rancangan penelitian ini adalah analitik cross sectional. Sampelnya adalah ibu hamil trimester 3 (usia kehamilan 30-40 minggu) di Puskesmas Dander Kabupaten Bojonegoro bulan Desember 2022 berjumlah 53 orang. Analisa data menggunakan uji Chi square dengan uji alternatif Fisher Exact dengan taraf signifikan ɑ = 0,05. Hasil Penelitian : Perceived benefit didapatkan nilai P value = 0,730 artinya tidak ada hubungan perceived benefit ibu hamil dengan perilaku kunjungan K6 dan perceived barrier didapatkan nilai P value = 0,464 artinya tidak ada hubungan perceived barrier ibu hamil dengan perilaku kunjungan K6. Kesimpulan : Perceived benefit dan perceived barrier ibu hamil tidak berhubungan dengan perilaku kunjungan K6 . Saran : Ibu hamil diharapkan lebih meningkatkan pengetahuan tentang manfaat melakukan kunjungan K6 sesuai dengan peraturan pemerintah yaitu 6 kali selama hamil.

 

Kata Kunci : Perceived Benefit, Perceived Barrier, Perilaku Kunjungan K6

 

ABSTRACT

 

Background :Data from the Local Area Monitoring Report for Maternal and Child Health (PWS KIA) of Dander Health Center in 2021, found that the K6 achievement problem at Dander Health Center had not reached the target, with a gap of 33.9% with the 2021 K6 target of 100% while Dander Health Center in 2021 achieved K6 of 66.1% of the total number of pregnant women as many as 563. Objective: To analyze the relationship between perceived benefits and perceived barriers of pregnant women with K6 visit behavior. Methodology: The design of this study was cross-sectional analytic. The sample was 53 pregnant women in the third trimester (gestational age 30-40 weeks) at Dander Health Center, Bojonegoro Regency in December 2022. Data analysis used the Chi-square test with the Fisher Exact alternative test with a significance level of ɑ = 0.05. Research Results: Perceived benefit obtained a P value = 0.730, meaning there is no relationship between perceived benefit of pregnant women and K6 visiting behavior and perceived barrier obtained a P value = 0.464, meaning there is no relationship between perceived barrier of pregnant women and K6 visiting behavior. Conclusion: Perceived benefit and perceived barrier of pregnant women are not related to K6 visiting behavior.

Suggestion :Pregnant women are expected to increase their knowledge about the benefits of conducting K6 visits in accordance with government regulations, namely 6 times during pregnancy.

 

Keywords: Perceived Benefit, Perceived Barrier, K6 Visit Behavior.

 

Keywords : Perceived Benefit, Perceived Barrier, K6 Visiting Behavior.

  1. Adiputra, I Made, et al. 2021. Health Research Methodology. Denpasar: Kita Menulis Foundation.
  2. Anwar, S. 2013. Business Research Methods. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  3. Arikunto. 2018. Research Procedures: A Practical Approach. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  4. Dewanggaya, KI, et al. 2022. Compliance of Pregnant Women in Conducting Antenatal Care (ANC) Visits During the Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal of Echo Nursing Vol. 15 No. 1. Poltekkes Kemenkes Denpasar.
  5. Dewi, DANN 2018. Validity and Reliability Test Module. Semarang: Diponegoro University.
  6. Faradhika, Aviati. 2018. Analysis of Antenatal Care (ANC) Visit Factors Based on Transcultural Nursing Theory in the Burneh Health Center Work Area. Thesis, Faculty of Nursing, Airlangga University Surabaya.
  7. Fitrayeni, et al. 2015. Causes of Low Completeness of Antenatal Care Visits for Pregnant Women in the Kera Area of Pegambiran Health Center. Andalas Public Health Journal.http://jurnal.fkm.unand.ac.id.
  8. Fitrihadi, Enny. 2017. Pregnancy Care Textbook with Checklist. Yogyakarta: Aisyiyah University of Yogyakarta.
  9. Heryana, Adi. 2020. Research Ethics. Tangerang: Esa Unggul University.
  10. Hupunau RE 2019. Analysis of Factors Related to Mother's Behavior in Fulfilling Nutritional Needs in Toddlers Based on the Health Belief Model Theory. Thesis, Faculty of Nursing, Airlangga University Surabaya.
  11. Irwan. 2017. Health Ethics and Behavior. Yogyakarta: CV Absolute Media.
  12. Istiqomah, Diah. 2017. The Relationship Between Gravida and Regularity of Antenatal Care (ANC) Examination at Sewon II Health Center, Bantul. Publication Manuscript, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of 'Aisyiyah Yogyakarta.
  13. Masturoh, I and Nauri AT 2018. Medical Records and Health Information (RMIK) Teaching Materials Health Research Methodology. Jakarta: PPSDM Kesehatan Kemenkes RI 2018 Edition.
  14. Mulyanto, Arif Dwi. 2015. Factors Related to the Behavior of Pregnant Women in Conducting Antenatal Care Visits at Bawen Health Center, Semarang. Thesis, Faculty of Sports Science, Semarang State University.
  15. Mursalim, Lestari. 2018. Factors Affecting Pregnant Women's K4 Visits at the Malimongan Baru Health Center, Makassar City in 2018. Thesis, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, UIN Alauddin Makassar.
  16. Nisaa, An, et al. 2022.The Relationship Between Pregnant Women's Perceptions and Antenatal Care Examination Behavior During the Covid-19 Pandemic in Depok City in 2022.Journal of Reproductive Health, 13 (02), 2022:133-140. https://journaliakmitangsel2.iakmi.or.id/index.php/kespro/article/view/47/43 (accessed March 26, 2023).
  17. MRL, Adventus., IMM Jaya, and D. Mahendra. 2019. Health Promotion Textbook. Jakarta: Indonesian Christian University.
  18. Notoatmodjo, S. 2012. Health Research Methodology. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  19. _____________. 2014. Health Promotion and Health Behavior. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  20. _____________. 2014. Health Behavior Science. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  21. Nursalam. 2015. Nursing Science Research Methodology. Jakarta: Salemba Medika.
  22. Bojonegoro Regency Government. 2020a. Bojonegoro Regency Health Profile 2020. Bojonegoro: Bojonegoro Regency Health Service.
  23. ____________________________. 2020b. The Role of Pregnant Women's Companions is Very Important in Reducing MMR and IMR.https://bojonegorokab.go.id/berita/4962/peran-pendamping-ibu-hamil-besar-cepat-tekan-aki-dan-akb.(accessed 10 January 2023).
  24. ____________________________. 2021. Bojonegoro Regency Health Profile 2021. Bojonegoro: Bojonegoro Regency Health Office.
  25. RI, Ministry of Health. 2022. Healthy Pregnant Women Movement for Healthier and Happier Pregnant Women. https://promkes.kemkes.go.id. (accessed January 09, 2023).
  26. ________________________. 2021a. Indonesia Health Profile 2021. Jakarta: Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia.
  27. ________________________. 2021b. Regulation of the Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia Number 21 of 2021 concerning the Provision of Health Services for the Pre-Pregnancy Period, Pregnancy, Childbirth, and Post-Childbirth Period, Contraceptive Services, and Sexual Health Services.https://jdih.kemkes.go.id. (accessed 26 October 2022).
  28. Pradono, J., et al. 2018. Quantitative Research Guide. Jakarta: Health Research and Development Agency Publishing Institute.
  29. Priyanti, et al. 2020. Frequency and Risk Factors of ANC Visits. Scientific Journal of Midwifery, Vol 6, No. 1, 2020.
  30. Putri, NR, et al. 2022. Midwifery Care for Pregnancy. Medan: Yayasan Kita Menulis.
  31. Rachmawati, Windi Chusniah. 2019. Health Promotion and Behavioral Science. Malang: Wineka Media.
  32. Rinaldi, SF and Bagya Mujianto. 2017. Medical Laboratory Technology (TLM) Teaching Materials Research Methodology and Statistics. Jakarta: PPSDM Kesehatan Kemenkes RI 2017 Edition.
  33. Setyawan, DA 2022. Textbook of Health Statistics Bivariate Analysis of Research Hypotheses. Surakarta: Tahta Media Group.
  34. Siwi, RPY and Heri Saputro. 2020. Analysis of Factors Influencing Low Integrated Antenatal Care (ANC) Visits in Pregnant Women in the Sukodono Health Center Working Area, Lumajang Regency. Journal For Quality In Women's Health. vol. 3 No. 1 March 2020.https://jqwh.org/index.php/JQWH/article/view/45.
  35. Sugiyono. 2019. Mixed Methods Research Methods. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  36. Sundari, Ayun. 2018. Overview of Frequency of ANC Visits in Pregnant Women at Kasihan II Health Center. Thesis, Faculty of Health Sciences, Alma Ata University Yogyakarta.
  37. Suparyanto. 2014. Definition of Pregnant Women.https://dr-suparyanto.blogspot.com. (accessed 25 October 2022).
  38. Surahman., et al. 2016. Research Methodology. Jakarta: BPPSDM Health Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia.
  39. Swarjana, I Ketut. 2022. Concept of Knowledge, Attitude, Behavior, Perception, Stress, Anxiety, Pain, Social Support, Compliance, Motivation, Satisfaction, Covid-19 Pandemic, Complete Access to Health Services with Theoretical Concepts, How to Measure Variables, and Questionnaire Examples. Yogyakarta: CV Andi Offset.
  40. Syahza, A. 2021. Research Methodology, Revised Edition. Pekanbaru: Unri Press.
  41. Trisliatanto, Dimas Agung. 2020. Research Methodology. Yogyakarta: Andi.
  42. Tyastuti, Siti. 2016. Printed Teaching Material Module for Midwifery for Pregnancy Midwifery Care. Jakarta: Health Human Resources Education Center.
  43. WHO. 2016. WHO Recommendations On Antenatal Care For A Positive Pregnancy Experience. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience.(accessed 11 November 2022).
  44. Widyawati, W., Pamungkasari, EP, & Murti, B. 2020. Contextual Effect of the
  45. Community Health Center on the Use of Antenatal Care: A Multilevel AnalysisEvidence from Semarang, Central Java. Journal of Maternal and Child Health,5(6), 663–672.https://doi.org/10.26911/thejmch.2020.05.06.06.(accessed March 20, 2023).
  46. Yanuaria, M. R and R. D Wulandari. 2013. Preparation of Antenatal Care Service Improvement Efforts Based on Voice of the Customer. Indonesian Journal of Health Administration Volume 1 Number 1 January-March 2013.https://media.neliti.com.
  47. Yuliani, DR, et al. 2021. Pregnancy Care. Medan: Our Writing Foundation.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2025 JKM (Jurnal Kebidanan Malahayati)

Policies

Submissions

Other

Focus and Scope
Section Policies
Peer Review Process
Publication Frequency
Open Access Policy
Online Submissions
Author Guidelines
Copyright Notice
Privacy Statement
Author Fees
Journal Sponsorship
Journal History
Site Map
About this Publishing System
JKM (Jurnal Kebidanan Malahayati)