Mapping Research on PPE Use and Risk Perception in the Maritime Industry: A Bibliometric Approach

Chairiyanti Chairiyanti, Adi Nugroho, Silvia Kristanti Tri Febriana, Nelly Al Audhah, Meitria Syahadatina Noor

Sari


ABSTRACT

 

Occupational safety in the maritime industry relies heavily on the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and the understanding of risk perception by ship crews. Despite this, there is still a gap in a comprehensive understanding of research patterns and developments in this area. This study aims to map and analyze research trends related to the use of PPE and risk perception in the maritime industry using a bibliometric approach. The research method used the Publish or Perish application to identify 50 relevant articles from the period 2014-2024, which were then analyzed using VOSviewer with the application of occurance 4 and term 23 criteria to produce network, overlay, and density visualizations. The results showed the dominance of Scandinavian countries in publications, with Sweden (9 publications) and Norway (7 publications) as the main contributors. Analysis of publication types showed a predominance of empirical research articles (34 publications), with peak productivity in 2018. VOSviewer identified three main clusters of research: operational aspects of PPE, regulation and compliance, and analysis and evaluation. The highest keyword frequencies were found in "safety" (21), "ship" (17), and "personal protective equipment" (16), indicating a major focus on safety aspects. Research gaps were identified in the aspects of integration of modern technologies, harmonization of international standards, and longitudinal evaluative studies. This study concludes that although the field has grown significantly, there are still substantial opportunities for more comprehensive research development, especially in the aspects of research methodology, impact analysis, and compliance evaluation of PPE use in the maritime industry.

 

Keywords: Personal Protective Equipment, Bibliometrics, Maritime Safety, Risk Perception, VOSviewer


Kata Kunci


Personal Protective Equipment, Bibliometrics, Maritime Safety, Risk Perception, VOSviewer

Teks Lengkap:

Download Artikel

Referensi


Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.

Ayan, B., Güner, E., & Son-Turan, S. (2022). Blockchain technology and sustainability in supply chains and a closer look at different industries: A mixed method approach. Logistics, 6(4), 85.

Bambang, P. (2023). Safety culture reduces ship accidents. ITS News.

Cheng, B., Wei, Y., Li, H., Huang, J., & Chen, H. (2023). Science Mapping the Knowledge Domain of Construction Workers’ Safety Behavior. Buildings, 13(6), 1365.

Dzaky, M., & Jar, A. (2024). The importance of using personal protective equipment (PPE) in construction workers. Corona Journal.

Ek, A., et al. (2021). Examining perceptual differences in maritime safety climate: A case study of Korean seafarers. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 9(4), 381.

Fleming, M., et al. (1998). Safety culture: A review of the literature. Journal of Safety Research.

Gadd, S., & Collins, A. (2002). Safety culture: A review of the literature. Health and Safety Executive.

Ginandi, W. R., Kurniasih, D., & Rachman, F. (2021). A model of factors affecting the use of personal protective equipment using a path analysis among PLTU contractor workers in East Java. IJOSH.

Herndon, V., et al. (2019). PPE vital to limiting maritime workers' injury risk: Study. Safety and Health Magazine.

HSE. (1992). Health and safety executive regulations on personal protective equipment. UK Government.

Lee, S. H., Kim, H., & Kwon, S. (2024). Fishing Vessel Risk and Safety Analysis: A Bibliometric Analysis, Clusters Review and Future Research Directions. Applied Sciences, 14(22), 10439.

Lombardi, D. A., et al. (2009). Barriers to personal protective equipment use among international seafarers. Journal of Safety Research.

Maritime Mutual. (2023). Personal protective equipment (PPE): The final safety barrier. MM Risk Bulletin.

Meng, X., & Chan, A. H. (2021). Current states and future trends in safety research of construction personnel: a quantitative analysis based on social network approach. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(3), 883.

Prasetiawan. (2023). Safety behavior is crucial to reducing the potential for ship accidents. IICET Journal Database.

Putri, L. A., & Hadi, C. (2014). Differences in safety performance in terms of the level of risk perception in workers. Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 3(1).

Ranjbari, M., Esfandabadi, Z. S., Gautam, S., Ferraris, A., & Scagnelli, S. D. (2023). Waste management beyond the COVID-19 pandemic: Bibliometric and text mining analyses. Gondwana Research, 114, 124-137.

Sarkar, S., & Maiti, J. (2020). Machine learning in occupational accident analysis: A review using science mapping approach with citation network analysis. Safety science, 131, 104900.

Vinh Thai, N., et al. (2019). The impact of personal protective equipment on maritime safety. Risk Analysis.

Vishdha, R. Z., et al. (2021). Factors causing work accidents in the sugar factory installation unit. Unnes Journal of Public Health.

Wang, X., Li, G., & Sun, X. (2023, August). Research on safety standardization management based on knowledge mapping. In Proceedings of the 2023 6th International Conference on Information Management and Management Science (pp. 100-108).

Wright, S., et al. (2019). A model of factors affecting the use of personal protective equipment using a path analysis. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Health.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33024/mnj.v7i2.18259

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


Penerbit: Universitas Malahayati


 Creative Commons License

Semua artikel dapat digunakan dibawah lisensi Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License