Digital Twin-Based Prediction of Engine Thermal Behavior and Emission Characteristics Under Variable ECU Calibration Strategies

Retno Wahyudi, Agus Apriyanto, Novia Utami Putri, Fauzi Ibrahim, Alexander Sembiring, Adam Wisnu Murti

Abstract


ABSTRACT

 

Contemporary engine development programmes face an intensifying conflict between compressed time-to-market schedules, escalating computational demands of high-fidelity simulation, and the exponentially growing dimensionality of the electronic control unit (ECU) calibration space in modern internal combustion engines. This article presents a novel digital twin (DT) framework capable of predicting engine thermal behaviour and exhaust emission characteristics in real time across variable ECU calibration strategies, without requiring a physical engine to be operated at every calibration point of interest. The proposed framework integrates a physics-informed neural network (PINN) thermal model of the engine cooling circuit and combustion chamber wall with a long short-term memory (LSTM) recurrent network trained on high-resolution in-cylinder pressure traces and exhaust emission measurements acquired from a production four-cylinder turbocharged gasoline direct injection (TGDI) engine. The PINN layer enforces energy conservation constraints during network training, ensuring thermodynamic consistency of predictions even in interpolated regions of the calibration space that were not represented in the training dataset. Across a validation set spanning 420 distinct ECU calibration points—varying ignition advance, fuel injection pressure, injection split ratio, boost pressure, and exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) rate—the digital twin predicted coolant outlet temperature with a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 1.43°C, indicated thermal efficiency with RMSE of 0.61%, brake-specific CO with RMSE of 3.82 g/kWh, brake-specific NOx with RMSE of 2.74 g/kWh, and total hydrocarbon (THC) emissions with RMSE of 1.96 g/kWh. Particulate number (PN) prediction achieved an RMSE of 6.3 × 10⁵ #/cm³ relative to measured values. Real-time inference latency averaged 4.7 ms per operating point on standard automotive-grade embedded hardware, enabling integration into hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) and model-in-the-loop (MIL) calibration workflows. The framework is shown to reduce the number of physical engine test cell hours required to populate a full-factorial calibration map by 73.6%, while maintaining prediction accuracy within the measurement uncertainty of the physical instrumentation. These results demonstrate that physics-informed digital twins represent a viable and transformative tool for next-generation ECU calibration methodology, with direct implications for achieving simultaneous fuel economy improvement and regulatory emission compliance.

 

Keywords: digital twin, ecu calibration, emission prediction, engine thermal model, hardware-in-the-loop, lstm, physics-informed neural network, turbocharged gdi.


Keywords


digital twin; ECU calibration; emission prediction; engine thermal model; hardware-in-the-loop; LSTM; physics-informed neural network; turbocharged GDI

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aguilar, E.M., Rueda, A., & Correa, J.C. (2022). Physics-informed deep learning for real-time thermal state estimation in automotive powertrains. Applied Thermal Engineering, 215, 118980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.118980

Arevalo, J., Miramontes, I., & Alvarez-Montoya, J. (2021). Physics-informed machine learning for turbulent combustion systems: a structured review. Combustion and Flame, 231, 111476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111476

Bachmann, C., Walther, M., & Niemeyer, K.E. (2022). Surrogate models for internal combustion engine calibration: a comparative study of Gaussian process regression, neural networks, and support vector machines. International Journal of Engine Research, 23(7), 1201–1219. https://doi.org/10.1177/14680874211003481

Battista, D., Ferraro, C., & Jakubiec, D. (2021). Calibration of complex powertrains using model-based approaches: from design of experiments to multi-objective optimisation. SAE International Journal of Engines, 14(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.4271/03-14-02-0011

Chen, H., Hu, J., & Wan, Y. (2023). Coupled digital twin for engine thermal management and emission prediction using physics-constrained deep learning. Energy Conversion and Management, 277, 116631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2023.116631

Cho, K., Van Merriënboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., & Bengio, Y. (2014). Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 1724–1734). Association for Computational Linguistics.

Duan, Q., Liu, Y., & Chen, R. (2021). A review of digital twin technology for internal combustion engine systems: current status and perspectives. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 152, 111737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111737

Grieves, M., & Vickers, J. (2017). Digital twin: mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems. In Kahlen, F.J., Flumerfelt, S., & Alves, A. (Eds.), Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems (pp. 85–113). Springer, Cham.

Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735–1780. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735

Huang, C., Li, Z., & Guo, X. (2022). Real-time NOx prediction for turbocharged diesel engines using LSTM recurrent neural networks. Applied Energy, 311, 118619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118619

Johnson, T.V., & Joshi, A. (2018). Review of vehicle engine efficiency and emissions. SAE International Journal of Engines, 11(6), 1307–1330. https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-0329

Kang, H., Lee, S., & Kim, J. (2022). Development of an engine thermal management digital twin for vehicle thermal calibration. Energies, 15(14), 5123. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15145123

Karniadakis, G.E., Kevrekidis, I.G., Lu, L., Perdikaris, P., Wang, S., & Yang, L. (2021). Physics-informed machine learning. Nature Reviews Physics, 3(6), 422–440. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-021-00314-5

Li, W., Zhao, J., & Yang, Q. (2022). A deep learning-based digital twin framework for engine emission prediction and optimisation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 377, 134425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134425

Liang, Y., Liu, F., & Sun, M. (2023). Multi-objective ECU calibration optimisation using Bayesian neural network surrogates and evolutionary algorithms. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 118, 105630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105630

Liu, X., Gopalakrishnan, A., & Kook, S. (2021). Hybrid physics-machine learning model for transient thermal prediction in turbocharged gasoline direct injection engines. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 168, 107062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2021.107062

Meng, D., Hu, Y., & Wu, P. (2023). Transfer learning-enhanced digital twin for engine emission prediction under variable fuel quality conditions. Energy, 271, 127014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.127014

Noack, M., Bossard, J., & Schmitt, K. (2021). Model-based calibration of automotive ECUs: a review of state-of-the-art and emerging methods. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 70(9), 8742–8758. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2021.3094847

Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., & Karniadakis, G.E. (2019). Physics-informed neural networks: a deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 378, 686–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045

Sager, S., Buerger, M., & Benzinger, W. (2022). Optimal calibration of modern engine systems via surrogate-assisted mixed-integer programming. Automatica, 146, 110551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2022.110551

Schulz, C., Thiessen, D., & Gerstenmeyer, S. (2020). Physical and data-driven modelling in engine calibration: current practice, challenges, and perspectives. MTZ Worldwide, 81(9), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s38313-020-0339-z

Shi, T., Zhang, R., & Chen, X. (2022). Digital twin-driven intelligent calibration system for automotive electronic control units. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 69(11), 11612–11622. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2021.3127018

Sohanian, A., Keshavarz, A., & Hajabdollahi, H. (2021). Combined effects of spark advance, EGR, and injection pressure on efficiency-emission trade-offs in a turbocharged GDI engine: a machine learning perspective. Fuel, 290, 120031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.120031

Tan, Y., Lu, J., & Dong, H. (2022). Physics-guided machine learning for combustion chemistry emulation: a systematic review. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 39(4), 4977–4996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2022.07.076

Wang, Q., Wang, X., & Su, Y. (2023). LSTM-based real-time NOx prediction for diesel engines considering thermal transients. Applied Energy, 334, 120698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.120698

Wu, Z., Lin, D., & Kim, C.H. (2022). Multi-task deep learning for simultaneous prediction of engine-out emissions and fuel consumption under transient conditions. Energy and AI, 8, 100147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyai.2022.100147

Yang, Z., Wu, K., & Cheng, Y. (2021). Gaussian process regression for engine emission prediction under sparse experimental data conditions. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 17(12), 7986–7996. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2021.3051618

Zhang, W., Hou, X., & Li, M. (2022). Transfer-learning approach for digital twin construction of internal combustion engines under limited data conditions. Applied Energy, 323, 119578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119578

Zhao, H., Tian, G., & Liu, B. (2023). Scalable digital twin framework for ECU calibration optimisation in passenger vehicle powertrains. Energy Conversion and Management, 296, 117669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2023.117669

Zhou, Y., Liu, C., & Zhang, H. (2022). An ensemble deep learning framework for robust engine-out particulate number prediction across variable calibration conditions. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 432, 128708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128708




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33024/jrets.v10i2.27574

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Rekayasa, Teknologi, dan Sains

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Secretariat Office:
UNIVERSITAS MALAHAYATI
Mail  : Jl. Pramuka No. 27, Kemiling, Kota Bandar Lampung
Telp  : 0811729009
email: jurnalrts.ft@malahayati.ac.id

 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
 
View My Stats