GAMBARAN SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING PADA ANAK YANG MEMILIKI ORANG TUA PENYANDANG TUNANETRA SEJAK LAHIR

Invokavit Putri Wau* -  Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana, Indonesia
Rudangta Arianti -  Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana, Indonesia
DOI : 10.33024/jpm.v3i2.4662

Supp. File(s): common.other

ABSTRACT: DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING IN CHILDREN WHOSE PARENTS WERE BLIND SINCE BIRTH

 

The purpose of this study was to determine the description of subjective well-being in children whose parents were blind since birth. This study uses a case study qualitative approach. The selection of research subjects using snowball. Characteristics of the subjects aged 13 to 18, unmarried, and has parents who are blind since birth. The data collection method uses in-depth interview techniques. The results showed that subjective well-being in children whose parents were blind, includes cognitive evaluation that is life satisfaction and affective evaluation. Subjective well-being aspects on the subject of life satisfaction are influenced by the domain of family, friends, school, job, and future. Their positive affects are happy, proud, and affection. Negative affects that appear are sad and depressed feeling. For further research, it is expected to discuss and compare subjective well-being with other persons with disabilities.

 

Keywords: Subjective Well-Being, Blind Individuals

 

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui gambaran subjective well-being pada anak yang memiliki orang tua penyandang tunanetra sejak lahir. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif studi kasus. Pemilihan subyek penelitian menggunakan snowball. Karakteristik subyek adalah yang berusia 13 sampai 18 tahun, belum menikah dan memiliki orang tua penyandang tunanetra sejak lahir. Metode pengumpulan data menggunakan teknik wawancara mendalam. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan subjective well-being pada anak yang memiliki orang tua penyandang tunanetra, meliputi penilaian kognitif yaitu kepuasan hidup dan penilaian afektif. Aspek subjective well-being pada subyek yaitu kepuasaan hidup yang dipengaruhi oleh domain keluarga, teman, sekolah, pekerjaan, dan masa depan. Afek positif yang mereka alami yaitu senang, bangga, dan kasih sayang. Afek negatif yang muncul adalah sedih dan perasaan tertekan. Untuk penelitian selanjutnya diharapkan dapat membahas dan membandingkan subjective well-being dengan penyandang disabilitas lainya.

 

Kata Kunci: Subjective Well-Being, Tunanetra

Supplement Files

Keywords : Psikologi; keluarga, disabilitas

  1. Amato, P. R. (2005). The impact of family formation change on the cognitive, social, and emotional well-being of the next generation. The future of children, 75-96.
  2. Aufseeser, D., Bourdillon, M., Carothers, R., & Lecoufle, O. (2018). Children's work and children's well‐being: Implications for policy. Development Policy Review, 36(2), 241-261.
  3. Bhomi, A.L. (2016). Children’s views on their lives and well-being in 17 countries: Key Messages from each country. International Survey of Children’s Well-Being (ISCWeB). Nepal.
  4. Chan, D. W. (2013). Subjective well-being of Hong Kong Chinese teachers: The contribution of gratitude, forgiveness, and the orientations to happiness. Teaching and Teacher Education, 32, 22-30.
  5. Chen, W. W. (2014). The relationship between perceived parenting style, filial piety, and life satisfaction in Hong Kong. Journal of family psychology, 28(3), 308.
  6. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Pendidikan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
  7. Creswell, J.W. (2016). Research Design, Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Terjemahan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  8. Cunsolo, S. (2017). Subjective wellbeing during adolescence: a literature review on key factors relating to adolescent’s subjective wellbeing and education outcomes. Studi sulla formazione, 20(1), 81-94.
  9. Devlieger, P., Rusch, F., & Pfeiffer, D. (2003). Rethinking disability as same and different! Towards a cultural model of disability. Rethinking disability: The emergence of new definitions, concepts, and communities, 9-16.
  10. Diener, E., & Scollon, C. (2003, October). Subjective well-being is desirable, but not the summum bonum. article présenté à la conférence University of Minnesota Interdisciplinary Workshop on Well-Being, Minneapolis.
  11. Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Oishi, S. (2002). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and life satisfaction. Handbook of positive psychology, 2, 63-73.
  12. Diener, E. (Ed.). (2009). The science of well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener (Vol. 37). Springer Science & Business Media.
  13. Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1997). Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators. Social indicators research, 40(1), 189-216.
  14. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological bulletin, 125(2), 276.
  15. Hurlock, E. B. (1997). Psikologi Perkembangan Suatu pendekatan rentang kehidupan. Jakarta: Erlangga.
  16. Haanpää, L., Kuula, M., & Hakovirta, M. (2019). Social relationships, child poverty, and children’s life satisfaction. Social Sciences, 8(2), 35.
  17. Hastuti, D. (2008). Pengasuhan: Teori dan prinsip serta aplikasinya di Indonesia. Departemen Ilmu Keluarga dan Konsumen, FEMA, IPB. Bogor.
  18. Hutz, C. S., Midgett, A., Pacico, J. C., Bastianello, M. R., & Zanon, C. (2014). The relationship of hope, optimism, self-esteem, subjective well-being, and personality in Brazilians and Americans. Psychology, 2014.
  19. Irzalinda, V., Puspitawati, H., & Muflikhati, I. (2014). Aktivitas bersama orang tua-anak dan perlindungan anak meningkatkan kesejahteraan subjektif anak. Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga & Konsumen, 7(1), 40-47.
  20. Kasim, E. R., Fransiska, A. S. M. I. N., Lusli, M. I. M. I., & Okta, S. I. R. A. D. J. (2010). Analisis situasi penyandang disabilitas di Indonesia: Sebuah desk-review. Pusat Kajian Disabilitas, Fakultas Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial dan Politik Universitas Indonesia.
  21. Knies, G. (2017). Income effects on children’s life satisfaction: Longitudinal Evidence for England.
  22. Kompri, M. P. I. (2016). Motivasi Pembelajaran Perspektif guru dan siswa. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
  23. Lam, W. W. T., Fielding, R., McDowell, I., Johnston, J., Chan, S., Leung, G. M., & Lam, T. H. (2012). Perspectives on family health, happiness and harmony (3H) among Hong Kong Chinese people: a qualitative study. Health Education Research, 27(5), 767-779.
  24. Li, Y., Lan, J., & Ju, C. (2015). Self-esteem, gender, and the relationship between extraversion and subjective well-being. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 43(8), 1243-1254.
  25. McKeown, K., Pratschke, J., & Haase, T. (2003). Family Well-being: What makes a difference? Study based on a representative sample of parents and children in Ireland.
  26. Meggiolaro, S., & Ongaro, F. (2014). Family contexts and adolescents' emotional status. Journal of Youth Studies, 17(10), 1306-1329.
  27. Mudjiran, M., Hartati, N., & Rinaldi, R. (2018). Optimalisasi pengasuhan pada keluarga miskin dalam rangka meningkatkan kesejahteraan subyektif anak di Kota Padang. Jurnal RAP (Riset Aktual Psikologi Universitas Negeri Padang), 8(2), 158-169.
  28. Papalia, D. E., Olds, S. W., & Feldman, R. D. (2007). Human development. McGraw-Hill.
  29. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assesment, 5 (2), 164-172. Diunduh pada tanggal, 16.
  30. Rees, G., Goswami, H., & Bradshaw, J. (2010). Developing an index of children's subjective well-being in England.
  31. Robustelli, B. L., & Whisman, M. A. (2018). Gratitude and life satisfaction in the United States and Japan. Journal of happiness studies, 19(1), 41-55.
  32. Rothman, J. (2018). Social work practice across disability. Routledge.
  33. Sari, C. P., & Coralia, F. (2015). Subjective Well-Being Pada Istri yang Memiliki Pasangan Tunanetra.
  34. Schinazi, V. R. (2007). Psychosocial implications ofblindness and low-vision.
  35. Sri, L. (2012). Psikologi Keluarga. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
  36. Suldo, S. M., & Fefer, S. A. (2013). Parent-child relationships and well-being. In Research, applications, and interventions for children and adolescents (pp. 131-147). Springer, Dordrecht.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Psikologi Malahayati
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.