ANALISIS LEARNING AGILITY KARYAWAN MILENIAL DI MASA PANDEMI COVID-19

Celine Anjanique Aretha Surya -  Universitas Mercu Buana Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Reny Yuniasanti* -  Universitas Mercu Buana Yogyakarta, Indonesia
DOI : 10.33024/jpm.v5i1.7545

Supp. File(s): common.other

Abstrak

Learning agility menjadi sebuah kebutuhan di masa pandemi COVID-19 bagi para karyawan milenial dan di era digital ini karyawan milenial dituntut untuk memiliki learning agility. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk melihat learning agility dengan analisis karyawan milenial di masa pandemi COVID-19. Subjek penelitian adalah 30 karyawan generasi milenial.Teknik sampling yang digunakan adalah purposive sampling dengan ciri berusia 22-41 tahun dan sudah bekerja minimal 3 bulan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian kuantitatif deskriptif. Pengumpulan data dalam penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan skala yang disusun berdasarkan 5 aspek learning agility yang terdiri dari innovating, performing, reflecting, risking, dan defending. Teknik analisa data deskriptif menggunakan perbandingan mean hipotetik dan mean empirik serta uji perbedaan dengan anova satu jalur. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan learning agility karyawan generasi milenial berada pada kategori tinggi. Skor rata-rata karyawan dengan rentang usia 27 tahun dan periode lama bekerja 4 bulan dan 23 bulan merupakan skor paling tinggi. Uji perbedaan ditemukan bahwa tidak ada perbedaan yang signifikan learning agility berdasarkan usia dan lama bekerja. Melalui penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan wawasan dan ilmu pengetahuan mengenai tingkatan learning agility.

 

Kata Kunci: Karyawan Milenial, Learning Agility, Pandemi COVID-19

 

Abstract

Learning agility has become a necessity during the COVID-19 pandemic for millennial employees and in this digital era millennial employees are required to have learning agility. The purpose of this research is to look at learning agility with the analysis of millennial employees during the COVID-19 pandemic. The research subjects were 30 millennial generation employees. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling with characteristics aged 22-41 years and had worked for at least 3 months. The research method used is descriptive quantitative research method. Data collection in this study was carried out using a scale based on 5 aspects of learning agility consisting of innovating, performing, reflecting, risking, and defending. The descriptive data analysis technique uses a comparison of the hypothetical mean and the empirical mean and the difference test with one-way ANOVA. The results of the study show that the learning agility of millennial generation employees is in the high category. The average score of employees with an age range of 27 years and a long working period of 4 months and 23 months is the highest score. The difference test found that there was no significant difference in learning agility based on age and length of work. This research is expected to provide insight and knowledge about the level of learning agility.

 

Keywords: Millennial Employees, Learning Agility, COVID-19 Pandemic

Supplement Files

Keywords : learning agility; karyawan milenial

  1. Ali, H., & Purwandi, L. (2017). The Urban Middle-Class Millenials Indonesia: Financial and Online Behavior. www.alvara-strategic.com
  2. Álvarez González, M. (2008). Career maturity: a priority for secondary education. In Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology (Vol. 16, Issue 3).
  4. Antara. (2021, January 23). Sensus Penduduk 2020, BPS: Generasi Z dan Milenial Dominasi Jumlah Penduduk RI. https://bisnis.tempo.co/read/1425919/sensus-penduduk-2020-bps-generasi-z-dan-milenial-dominasi-jumlah-penduduk-ri
  5. Azwar, S. (2016). Penyusunan skala psikologi edisi kedua (2nd ed.). Pustaka Pelajar.
  6. de Meuse, K. P. (2017). Learning agility: Its evolution as a psychological construct and its empirical relationship to leader success. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 69(4), 267–295. https://doi.org/10.1037/cpb0000100
  7. de Meuse, K. P., Dai, G., & Hallenbeck, G. S. (2010). Learning agility: A construct whose time has come. Consulting Psychology Journal, 62(2), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019988
  8. Derue, D. S., Ashford, S. J., & Myers, C. G. (2012). Learning Agility: In Search of Conceptual Clarity and Theoretical Grounding. In Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Vol. 5).
  9. Faisal, M. (2017). Generasi Phi: Memahami Milenial Pengubah Indonesia (S. Maradona & U. Rusydan, Eds.). Republika.
  10. Gravett, L. S., & Caldwell, S. A. (2016). Learning Agility Learning Agility The Impact On Recruitment And Retention Learning Agility Learning Learning Learning Learning Agility Agility Agility Agility The Impact On Recruitment And Retention.
  11. Hallenbeck, G. (2016). learning-agility-unlock-the-lessons-of-experience.
  12. Jatmika, D., & Puspitasari, K. (2019). Learning Agility Pada Karyawan Generasi Millennial Di Jakarta. Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, Dan Seni, 3(1), 187. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmishumsen.v3i1.3446
  13. Johansen, B. (2012). Leaders make the future: Ten new leadership skills for an uncertain world.
  14. Meryka Santoso, A. (2021). Analysis Of Learning Agility In The Performance Of Achievement Teachers In Yogyakarta. Jurnal Pedagogik, 08(01).https://ejournal.unuja.ac.id/index.php/pedagogik
  15. Meyer, P. (2016). Agility Shift: Creating agile and effective leaders, teams, and organizations. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315230559
  16. Mitchinson, A., & Morris, R. (2012). Learning About LearningAgility.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266852352
  17. Mungkasa, O. (2020). Bekerja dari Rumah (Working From Home/WFH): Menuju Tatanan Baru Era Pandemi COVID 19. Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan: The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning, 4(2), 126–150. https://doi.org/10.36574/jpp.v4i2.119
  18. Mustajab, D., Bauw, A., Rasyid, A., Irawan, A., Akbar, M. A., & Hamid, M. A. (2020). Working From Home Phenomenon As an Effort to Prevent COVID-19 Attacks and Its Impacts on Work Productivity. TIJAB (The International Journal of Applied Business), 4(1),13.https://doi.org/10.20473/tijab.V4.I1.2020.13-21
  19. Perusahaan. (n.d.). Retrieved October 31, 2021, from https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perusahaan
  20. Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D (25th ed.). Alfabeta.
  21. Syahchari, D. H., Lasmy, Herlina, M. G., Saroso, H., Sudrajat, D., & Jordaan, H. K. W. (2021). The Influence of Digital Employee Experience and Employee Agility: Do They Boost Firm’s Effectiveness? 2021 International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech), 67–71. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMTech53080.2021.9534976
  22. Yuniasanti, R., Binti Abas, N. A. H., & Hamzah, H. (2019). Employee turnover intention among Millennials: The role of psychological well-being and experienced workplace incivility. HUMANITAS: Indonesian Psychological Journal, 16(2), 74. https://doi.org/10.26555/humanitas.v16i2.12544
  23. Zainal, A., & Suhartana, L. W. P. (2018). Pengantar Hukum Perusahaan. Prenada media group.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Psikologi Malahayati
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.