PENGARUH FUN AT WORK TERHADAP WORK ENGAGEMENT PADA KARYAWAN STARTUP

Febriani Poppy Rusdiana* -  Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia
DOI : 10.33024/jpm.v5i2.8218

Supp. File(s): common.other
Abstrak

Pada era digital, ide-ide kreatif berkembang dengan memanfaatkan teknologi modern. Perubahan tren bisnis membuka banyak peluang baru bagi usaha-usaha kecil untuk berkembang. Kemajuan teknologi membuat tempat kerja mengembangkan lingkungan kerja yang kompetitif. Penelitian ini memiliki tujuan untuk mengetahui adanya pengaruh antara fun at work terhadap work engagement pada karyawan. Jumlah partisipan dalam penelitian sebanyak 121 orang. Pendekatan kuantitatif digunakan pada penelitian dengan menggunakan metode survei. Analisis data penelitian menggunakan regresi linear sederhana. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan jika terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan antara fun at work terhadap work engagement sebanyak. Pengaruh fun at work dimensi socializing with coworkers, celebrating at work, dan personal freedom terhadap work engagement sebanyak16,9%. Ditemukan juga besar pengaruh fun at work dimensi global fun at work terhadap work engagement adalah 52,5%. Data tersebut menunjukkan jika semakin tinggi fun at work di tempat kerja, maka akan meningkatkan engagement karyawan. Implikasi pada penelitian ini adalah perlunya memperhatikan fun at work pada pekerja startup agar tidak berdampak negative terhadap tingkat work engagement pekerja.

 

Kata kunci: Fun at Work, Engagement, Startup.

 

Abstract

In the digital era, creative ideas are developed by utilizing modern technology. Changes in business trends open up many new opportunities for small businesses to grow. Technological advances make the workplace develop a competitive work environment. This study aims to determine the effect of fun at work on employee engagement. The number of participants in the study was 121. A quantitative approach is used in research using survey methods. Analysis of research data using simple linear regression The results of this study indicate that there is a significant influence of fun at work on work engagement. Effect of fun at work dimensions of socializing with coworkers, celebrating at work, and personal freedom on work engagement as much as 16.9%. It was also found that the effect of fun at work on the global dimension of fun at work on work engagement is 52.5%. The data shows that the more fun at work in the workplace, the higher employee engagement will be. The implication of this research is the need to pay attention to the fun at work of startup workers so that it does not have a negative impact on the level of work engagement of workers.

 

Keywords: Fun at Work, Engagement, Startup.

Supplement Files

Keywords : Psikologi; Kesehatan Mental di Tempat Kerja; Pendidikan

  1. Andrew, O. C., & Sofian, S. (2011). Engaging People who Drive Execution and Organizational Performance Ologbo C . Andrew and Saudah Sofian Faculty of Management and Human Resource Development ,. Journal of Economics and Business, 3(3), 569–575.
  2. Bakker, A. B, & Leiter M. P. (2010). Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research. Psychology Press.
  3. Bakker, Arnold B. (2011). An evidence-based model of work engagement. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(4), 265–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411414534
  4. Biotechnology, B. (2020). Bioscience Biotechnology Research Communications Special Issue Volume 13 Number (10) 2020. 13(10), 1–2.
  5. Blank, S., & Dorf, B. (2018). The Startup Owner’s Manual: The Step-By-Step Guide for Building a Great Company.
  6. Busch, E., Nash, J., & Bell, B. . (2011). Remote Work: An Examination of Current Trends and Emerging Issues.
  7. Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). WORK ENGAGEMENT: A QUANTITATIVE REVIEW AND TEST OF ITS RELATIONS WITH TASK ...: EBSCOhost. Personnel Psychology, 64, 89–136. http://web.a.ebscohost.com.tcsedsystem.idm.oclc.org/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=2&sid=762314f7-db10-45ee-b18f-6de541ad2ea1%40sessionmgr4009
  8. Deal, T., & Kennedy, A. (1999). The New Corporate Cultures. Orion Business, London, UK.
  9. Federman, B. (2009). Employee Engagement: A Road For Creating Profits, Optimizing Perfomance, And Increasing Loyalty. Jossey Bass.
  10. Fleming, P. (2005). Workers’ playtime? Boundaries and cynicism in a “culture of fun” program. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41(3), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886305277033
  11. Flores, M. F. (2019). Understanding The Challenges Of Remote Working And It’s Impact To Workers. International Journal of Business Marketing and Management (IJBMM), 4(11), 40–44.
  12. Fluegge-Woolf, E. R. (2014). Play hard, work hard: Fun at work and job performance. Management Research Review, 37(8), 682–705. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-11-2012-0252
  13. Ford, R., McLaughlin, F., & Newstrom, J. (2003). Questions and answers about fun at work. People and Strategy, 26(4), 18.
  14. Gable, S. L., Impett, E. A., Reis, H. T., & Asher, E. R. (2004). What do you do when things go right? The intrapersonal and interpersonal benefits of sharing positive events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 228–245. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.228
  15. Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The Good, the Bad, and the Unknown About Telecommuting: Meta-Analysis of Psychological Mediators and Individual Consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524–1541. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524
  16. Gallup. (2021). State of the Global Workplace: 2021 Report. Workplace Insights, 219. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/insights.aspx
  17. Hussien, F. (2017). A multiple case study on employee engagement and retention at startup companies. Thesis.
  18. Karl, K., & Peluchette, J. (2006). How Does Workplace Fun Impact Employee Perceptions of Customer Service Quality? Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 13(2), 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/10717919070130020201
  19. Kataria, A., Garg, P., & Rastogi, R. (2013). Work Engagement in India: Validation of the Utrecht Work Engagement. Asia-Pacific Journal of Management Research and Innovation, 9(3), 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/2319510x13519322
  20. Kristiana, I. F., Fajrianthi, F., & Purwono, U. (2019). Analisis Rasch Dalam Utrecht Work Engagement Scale-9 (Uwes-9) Versi Bahasa Indonesia. Jurnal Psikologi, 17(2), 204. https://doi.org/10.14710/jp.17.2.204-217
  21. Lawless, M., McCann, F., & McIndoe Calder, T. (2014). SMEs in Ireland: contributions, credit and economic crisis. Policy Studies, 35(5), 435–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2014.886681
  22. Low, M. B., & MacMillan, I. C. (1988). Ent past research and future challenges. In Journal of Management (Vol. 14, Nomor 2, hal. 139–161).
  23. Mishra, T., & Jena, L. (2020). Virtual workplaces and lean leadership: integrative conceptualization and organizational implications. Strategic HR Review, 19(4), 21–24.
  24. Müceldili, B., & Erdil, O. (2016). Finding Fun in Work: The Effect of Workplace Fun on Taking Charge and Job Engagement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235(October), 304–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.034
  25. Mungkasa, O. (2020). Bekerja dari Rumah (Working From Home/WFH): Menuju Tatanan Baru Era Pandemi COVID19. The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning, 4(2).
  26. Park, J., & Yang, H. (2014). A study on factors affecting the performances of women start-ups in Korea, focused on knowledge and technology-based businesses. J. Korean Entrep. Soc, 9, 1–29.
  27. Permata, S., & Ahman, E. (2022). Volume . 18 Issue 2 ( 2022 ) Pages 326-332 INOVASI : Jurnal Ekonomi , Keuangan dan Manajemen ISSN : 0216-7786 ( Print ) 2528-1097 ( Online ) Komparasi employee engagement saat WFO dan WFH Comparison of employee engagement during WFO and WFH. 18(2), 326–332. https://doi.org/10.29264/jinv.v18i2.10552
  28. Plester, B., & Hutchison, A. (2016). Fun times: the relationship between fun and workplace engagement. Employee Relations, 38(3), 332–350. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-03-2014-0027
  29. Prahara, S. A. (2020). Budaya Organisasi dengan Work Engagement pada Karyawan. Jurnal RAP (Riset Aktual Psikologi Universitas Negeri Padang), 10(2), 232. https://doi.org/10.24036/rapun.v10i2.106977
  30. Schaufeli, W. B. (2002). THE MEASUREMENT OF ENGAGEMENT AND BURNOUT: A TWO SAMPLE CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYTIC APPROACH. Journal of Happiness Studies, 71–92.
  31. Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471
  32. Setyowati, D. (2021). Indonesia Masuk 5 Besar dengan Startup Terbanyak di Dunia. Katadata.co.id. https://katadata.co.id/desysetyowati/digital/617e5accc75b9/indonesia-masuk-5-besar-dengan-startup-terbanyak-di-dunia
  33. Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitan Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D (Sutopo (ed.); 2nd Editio). ALFABETA.
  34. Tengeh, R. K., & Nkem, L. (2017). Sustaining immigrant entrepreneurship in South Africa: The role of informal financial associations. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081396
  35. Wijanarko, Y. (2019). Jumlah Startup di Indonesia Ratusan atau Ribuan? Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia. https://kominfo.go.id/content/detail/17233/jotal-startup-di-indonesia-ratusan-atau-ribuan/0/sorotan_media
  36. Yosani, C. (2006). Teknik Analisis Kuantitatif. Makalah Teknik Analisis II, 1–7. http://staffnew.uny.ac.id/upload/132232818/pendidikan/Analisis+Kuantitatif.pdf
  37. Yuniarsih, T. (2018). Kinerja Unggul Sumber Daya Manusia. Rizqi Press.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Psikologi Malahayati
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.