MEMAHAMI BUKTI VALIDITAS EMPIRIK MELALUI SKALA SIKAP TERHADAP PELAJARAN SOSIOLOGI

Muhammad Ivan* -  Universitas Jambi, Indonesia
Jelpa Periantalo -  Universitas Jambi, Indonesia
Beny Rahim -  Universitas Jambi, Indonesia
Agung Iranda -  Universitas Jambi, Indonesia
DOI : 10.33024/jpm.v5i1.8723

Supp. File(s): common.other

Abstrak

Artikel  bertujuan memberikan pemahaman bukti validitas empirik melalui data Statistika dengan uji deskriptif, hubungan dan perbedaan. Instrumen yang digunakan Skala Sikap terhadap pelajaran Sosiologi dari teori Charles Osgood. Subjek penelitian adalah Siswa SMA dan mahasiswa Fakultas Kedokteran – Universitas Jambi dengan N=455. Pada uji deskriptif, skala sikap terhadap Sosiologi memiliki nilai rata-rata tertinggi dari pelajaran Sosial Humaniora yang lain. Pada uji korelasi, skala sikap terhadap Sosiologi memiliki korelasi positif sedang dengan Geograpi, Sejarah dan Ekonomi. Ia menghasilkan korelasi positif sangat rendah dengan Minat Psikis-Tes Minat Indonesia dan korelasi negatif sangat rendah dengan Tes Potensi Akademik. Ada perbedaan sikap terhadap Sosiologi berdasarkan peminatan SMA, program studi dan kepribadian serta tidak ada perbedaan berdasarkan jenis kelamin. Untuk keperluan diagnosis, skala dapat didukung oleh validitas yang baik. Untuk keperluan prognosis, skala perlu diuji dengan variabel prestasi belajar.

 

Kata Kunci : Validitas, Korelasi, Uji Beda, Signifikansi, Kelompok

 

Abstract

The article aims to provide an understanding of the empirical validity of evidence through Statistics data with test of descriptive, relationships and differences. The instrument was used the Scale of Attitudes towards Sociology from Charles Osgood's theory. Research subjects were high school students and students of the Faculty of Medicine - Jambi University with N = 455. Sociology had the highest score than other social science scales. There was a moderate positive correlation with Geography, History and Economics scale. There was a higly positive correlation with Psyche Interest and  a highly negative with Academic Cognitive Test. There was a difference score attitude toward Sociology based on high school majoring, university program, personality and no correlation with gender. For the diagnosis purpose, it contained good validity evidence. We need criterion related validity for prognosis purposes firstly with academic achievement.

 

Keywords: Validity, Correlation, Different Test, Significance, Group

Supplement Files

Keywords : validitas, korelasi, uji beda, signifikansi, kelompok

  1. AERA, APA, & NCME. (2014). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
  2. Apriliyanto, B., Saputro, D. R. S., & Riyadi.(2018). Student’s social interaction in mathematics learning. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 983). Institute of Physics Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012130
  3. Balkin, R. S. (2017). Evaluating evidence regarding relationships with criteria. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 50 (4), 264-269. doi:10.1080/07481756.2017.1336928.
  4. Berndt, M., Schmidt, F. M., Sailer, M., Fischer, F., Fischer, M. R., & Zottmann, J. M. (2021). Investigating statistical literacy and scientific reasoning & argumentation in medical-, social sciences-, and economics students. Learning and Individual Differences, 86, 101963 .https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101963
  5. Baron, R. A., & Byrne, D. E. (2002). Social psychology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  6. Bolarinwa, O. (2015). Principles and methods of validity and reliability testing of questionnaires used in social and health science researches.Nigeria Postgraduate Medical Journal, 22(4), 195. https://doi.org/10.4103/1117-1936.173959
  7. Chráska, M., & Chrásková, M. (2016).Semantic Differential and its Risks in the Measurement of Students’ Attitudes.Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217, 820–829.https://doi.org/ 10.10116/j/sbspro.2016.02.155
  8. Robert F. DeVellis. (2017). Scale Development Theory and Applications ( Fourth Edition Robert). SAGE Publication (Vol. 4, p. 256).Sage Publications. Retrieved from https://b-ok.cc
  9. Divilová, S. (2016). Semantic Differential as One of the Research Tools Suitable for Establishing the Attitudes of Pupils to Old Age and Seniors. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(8), 1858–1862. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040815
  10. Fitri, A. D., Periantalo, J., & Istarini A. (2014). Sikap mahasiswa program studi pendidikan dokter 2013 Fakultas Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan Universitas Jambi angkatan universitas jambi terhadap pelajaran matematika dan sains. Jambi Medical Journal ‘Jurnal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan’, 1 (2),56-76.
  11. Goodwin, L. D., & Leech, N. L. (2003). The Meaning of Validity in the New Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing: Implications for Measurement Courses. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development. 36, 181-191. SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2003.11909741
  12. Howel, C.D. (2018). Statististical method for Psychology. 7th Ed. Bellmon: Wadworth.
  13. Kurpius, S. E. R., Stafford, M.E. (2006). Testing and measurement: A user-friendly guide. California: Thousand Oaks.
  14. Kyriazos, T. A., & Stalikas, A. (2018).Applied Psychometrics: The Steps of Scale Development and Standardization Process.Psychology, 09(11), 2531–2560. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2018.911145
  15. Periantalo, J., Fadzlul, F., & Saputra, N. E. (2014).Konstruksi skala sikap terhadap pelajaran Matematika dan Sains.Edu-Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 3 (2), 36-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.22437/jmpmipa.v3i2.1894.
  16. Periantalo, J., & Azwar, S. (2017). Pengembangan Skala Kepribadian Siswa Sma Dari Tipologi Kepribadian Jung Dan Myers-Briggs. Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora, 1(2), 191–207.https://doi.org/10.22437/jssh.v1i2.4301.
  17. Periantalo, J. (2018). Validitas kriteria Tes Potensi Akademik Unja (Criterion related validity of TPA Unja).Intuisi: Jurnal Psikologi Ilmiah, 10 (1), 1-9.
  18. Periantalo, J., Saputra, E., & Sarman, F. (2019).Validitas kelompok minat ilmu psikis Tes Minat Indonesia dengan TPA dan skala sikap terhadap pelajaran.Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia, 8 (1), 7-12.
  19. Pepper, D., Hodgen, J., Lamesoo, K., Kõiv, P., &T olboom, J. (2018). Think aloud: using cognitive interviewing to validate the PISA assessment of student self-efficacy in mathematics. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 41 (1), 3-16. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2016.1238891.
  20. Peterson, C. H., Peterson, N. A., & Powell, K. G. (2017). Cognitive interviewing for item development: validity evidence based on content and response processes. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 50 (4), 217-223. doi:10.1080/07481756.2017.1339564.
  21. Sato, J. (2017). Additional Report abaout the Validity of the Jung Psychological Types Scale.Online Journal of Japanese Clinical Psychology, 4, 1-7.
  22. Sireci, S. & Padilla, J. L. (2014).Validating assessments: Introduction to the special section.Psicothema, 26 (1), 97-99.doi 10.7334/psicothema2013,.255.
  23. Stangor, C. (2010). Introduction to Psychology. Boston:Flat World Knowledge.
  24. Urbina, S. (2014).Essentials of psychological testing, 2nd ed.Essentials of psychological testing, 2nd ed. (pp. xiii, 385–xiii, 385).
  25. Widawati, K., Rochani, S., & Rohmad, Z. (2018). Pengaruh pemanfaatan sumber belajar dan minat belajar terhadap prestasi belajar sosiologi siswa SMA Negeri 3 Boyolali.Jurnal Pendidikan sosiologi Antropologi
  26. ,
  27. Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta, 1-20.Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/290565828.pdf

Open Access Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Psikologi Malahayati
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.